That’s why I recommend turning off server filters if possible. Training SpamSieve will not prevent a server filter from putting good messages in the Spam mailbox. So if Gmail is catching the messages as Spam, I would expect them to go the Gmail Spam mailbox and not get sent to SpamSieve. My understanding is that Airmail only sends the inbox messages to SpamSieve for analysis. So, if Gmail sees these messages as Spam, is SpamSieve bringing them through to Airmail? Does “training” SpamSieve really work in this circumstance if Gmail is going to always catch spam? In other words, if I “Train as good” in Airmail - will the next message like that get through Gmail? However, Airmail or SpamSieve appears to catch these messages also and places them in the Airmail Spam folder! I have Gmail set to retrieve mail from Earthlink (spam disabled) It’s free and it works great, easily 99.5%+ accurate.I have set up this filter but Gmail continues to catch spam. Likewise, for the very rare spam that gets through to my Inbox, I just click a button “Delete as Spam” that teaches the add-in about something new. I press a “Recover from Spam” button and SpamBayes moves it to my Inbox. I look through the junk folder every month or so for things that have been misfiled – often two or three corporate mailing list things will wind up there. It sounds like it works just like SpamSieve. It’s brilliant enough that I’ve never bothered to get an update for it. I am sure there must be an equivalent for Windows, but this is the one to cure spam on the Mac.įor a SpamSieve-like program for Windows, I’ve been using SpamBayes (with Outlook on Windows XP) for the last three years. As it is I can happily live with it removing 99+%. Without that temporary lapse, I think SpamSieve would filter out 100% of the correct spam. I think the 99% batting average of my SpamSieve would be 1% better if it weren’t for two factors: 1) Because of product reviews my mail is more spamish than most, and 2) in the last 6 months spammers started sending image spam (the text is a picture) which as taken SpamSieve a while to figure out. For all that nothing I get a squeaky clean in box with a rare spam intruder. That’s it! SpamSieve also knows my friends from my address book, and it can be told about specific address or domains in hundreds of direct ways if you care to, but mostly I simply do nothing. Then about twice a month I go through my Junk Mail box and pluck out two or three “goods” that got through with a single keystroke that again admonishes SpanSieve of their proper state. I needed only a few minutes fiddling to get it up and running, and thereafter, I merely delete the occasional stray spam with a keystroke that simultaneously scolds SpamSieve about its correct nature and sends it to the dump. Like many of the best spam filters SpamSieve uses Bayesian tricks to learn from your in-box what kind of mail you approve of and what you hate. I’ve used some good spam filters before but they didn’t learn fast enough, or needed too much attention to keep on top of their game. My wife, who has a Mac at work, was complaining about her spam load, and I realized, “oh my gosh, you mean you don’t know about SpamSieve?” I don’t have to open the app it somehow sits quietly behind most email programs. SpamSieve is so invisible and maintenance free that I’ve just about forgotten about it - despite the fact that my email has been widely posted on the web for 10 years. I have been using it for almost three years now and its statistics show that over that time it was 99% accurate. SpamSieve is the best spam filter for the Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |